Find Your Best Path Forward in High-Stakes Litigation
Get the answers and insight you need to determine your best move and achieve your best outcome.
Settle, Stay the Course, or Shift Strategy?
Like all important business decisions, significant moves in litigation should be based on the best available market intel--not feelings, hunches, or instinct.
When facing the risks inherent in high-stakes litigation you need relevant and reliable metrics that inform and justify your decision-making. Our proven approach will get you what you need.
Common questions we help answer:
-
How will a jury’s emotions impact their decision-making in my case?
-
Is my position too complex or technical for laypeople to understand?
-
Are my witnesses likeable and credible?
-
How do jurors react to the plaintiff’s damages claim?
-
Are there fatal gaps or flaws in my argument?
-
How do I identify my best and worst jurors?
Quantify your risks and opportunities, and you'll be more confident in making the right decision.
Get reliable jury metrics on the risks and opportunities in your specific case, as well as guidance for simplifying and improving the persuasive impact of your position.
Jury Appeal
Focus Your Signal, Eliminate the Noise
SM
A confused jury is scary and unpredictable. No matter how “complex” your case, we can help you understand, simplify, and clarify your best message, and position counsel as a trusted guide through the evidence, with an easy-to-understand call-to-action that jurors can feel good about.
Jury Research
Quantify Risk & Opportunities
Testing serves an essential and obvious role in all high-stakes endeavors for good reason. Whether you want to test themes, evaluate a witness, assess damages, competing liability theories, or determine with statistical significance the jurors you must exclude at trial, we can design an approach that will get you what you need on time and on budget.
Jury Selection
Find Friends, Know Your Enemy
We turn data-driven insights into competitive advantage in the courtroom. Our proven jury selection process focuses on identifying and eliminating the most antagonistic jurors (preferably for cause) and developing effective lines of inquiry to address and influence the remaining jurors' perceptions of critical verdict issues.
-- Earning Long-Term Trust --
>90% of our Matters Come from Repeat & Referred Clients
"The Cream of the Crop in Florida"
David Ackerman
Akerman LLP
How to Get Started:
Which Approach is Best for You?
Roundtables
TM
In-Person or Online
Our Most Popular Approach
Easiest to Iterate
Early Phase Testing
Least Expensive
Broadest Feedback
Jury Focus Groups
In-Person
Flexible Approach
Built-in Iteration
Pre-settlement Phase Testing
Mid-range Cost
More Specific Feedback
Mock Trials
In-Person
Traditional Approach
Expensive to Iterate
Pre-trial Phase Testing
Higher Cost
Most Specific Feedback